Now it would appear that the very dense John "did I ever tell you that I was in Vietnam" and the even more dense Sarah "legs and breasts and a big cheesy grin" Palin are getting personal in their campaign against Barrack Obama. Apparently Obama has crossed paths sporadically with Bill Ayers, who was one of the founders of the Weathermen, a radical group that launched a bombing campaign against the American establishment; a sort of American equivalent of the German "Rote Armee Faktion" and the Italian "birgada rossa". Now it doesn't appear to matter that Mr Obama has never expressed sympathy for the radical views and actions of Mr. Ayers, whom he has called “somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8.”1 However, Sarah has been advised by aides, "the gloves are off, the heels are on, go get to them."2 It is, of course, extremely doubtful that Sarah had ever heard of the Weathermen prior to her aides telling her and it is, therefore, hardly to be expected that she had ever heard of Bill Ayers. Still the gloves are off and Sarah had her campaign donors cheering in Englewood, Colorado, when she said: "Our opponent ... is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he's palling around with terrorists who would target their own country... This is not a man who sees America as you see America and as I see America."3 Well, she was addressing people who support her campaign but surely, surely the American public won't be listening to drivel like this.
John "did I ever tell you that I was in Vietnam" McCain on the other hand is a contemporary of Bill Ayers and he had heard of him before. In a televised interview last spring, he asked, “How can you countenance someone who was engaged in bombings that could have or did kill innocent people?”4 John, he was engaged in bombings that "could have or did" kill innocent people. The evidence would appear to suggest that he didn't kill anyone and John even if he did, kill someone, so did you. In fact John, do you remember why you were in the Hanoi Hilton? That's right John, you were flying over Vietnam dropping great big fucking bombs on innocent civilians. The Mayor of Chicago, Richard M Daly said in an interview last week, "“He (Mr Ayers) has done a lot of good in this city and nationally,” and then went on to explain that he has consulted Mr Ayers on school issues; Mr Ayers is now an Education Professor at the University of Illinois. Mr. Daley, whose father was Chicago’s mayor during the street violence accompanying the 1968 Democratic National Convention and the so-called Days of Rage the following year, said he saw the bombings of that time in the context of a polarized and turbulent era.5 Well, I am prepared, to see John as the product of a polarized and turbulent era. However, unlike Mr Ayers, John "did I ever tell you that I was in Vietnam" McCain hasn't moved on or even begun to ask whether he might in fact have been wrong.
What we have, of course, is an infantile effort to discredit Barrack Obama. Nevertheless, it is, of course, true when Palin refers to Obama by saying to her followers, "..... This is not a man who sees America as you see America and as I see America." There are a lot of people who see America just as Palin and, indeed, McCain, see it and that is why Obama could lose. Still, the reality is that Obama does have a brain and that is why he sees America differently from Palin and McCain and their followers and, while he will be constrained and reigned in by the establishment and the requirements of American "Realpolitik", he is capable of ensuring that a less unilateral and more diplomatic foreign policy is pursued. The alternative is too dreadful to consider.
1 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/us/politics/04ayers.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
2 http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/10/palin_obamas_terrorist_pallin.html
3 ibid see also http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=gi3oP74kMjA
4 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/us/politics/04ayers.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
5 ibid
5 comments:
hey Jim,
Very interested in the presidential election too, just wondering how you can place the importance of this race considering your other blogs about the caucuses and the obvious strategic role the american conglomerates and the "military industiral complex" have in deciding the policy and fate of this superpower, surely it is just a facade, with the same puppetmasters still behind it?
Interested to hear your views, does it realy matter who wins?
George
It is definitely a fair point: if we are to look at the two most recent democratic presidents, Jimmy Carter (1977-1981) and Bill Clnton (1993-2001),we might be tempted to say, "Yes, it does matter". For instance, it was during Carter's presidency that we had the Camp David Accords and peace between Egypt and Israel and during Clinton's presidency that the full weight of NATO was used to stop the persecution of Kosovar Albanians. Both those events and many more, however, stink of hypocrisy and, in retrospect, the questions might be asked, who did Camp David and the war against Yugoslavia actually benefit?
America's strategic aims have always been the real motivating factor behind its actions and it was during Carter's presidency that the United States supported the Khmer Rouge both diplomatically and militarly and remember, this was an organisation that massacred up to 30% of its own population. Moreover, twenty years later Bill Clinton flouted international law when he spearheaded the bombing of Yugoslavia.
The evidence would, therefore, appear to suggest that you are correct and that American presidents are, indeed, mere puppets something, which was almost gallingly evidenced when Obama gave an Oscar winning performance to the AIPAC. However, despite the hypocrisy,support of a mass murderer and flouting of international law mentioned above, I still believe that a Democratic Administration is the lesser of two evils and that, while it will have to work within certain parametres, it can be a restraining influence. Should McCain and Palin get elected they will facilitate a myopic final fling from the military industrial complex that will, indeed, end in humiliation. This is something I don't want to happen because, while I am glad that America's days as the sole superpower are coming to an end, I, nevertheless, believe that, despite her inadequecies, hypocrisy and, yes, arrogance, she still has an important role to play in a new international order. Or would you rather have the Russians and Chinese dictating the show on their own?
granted "mere puppets" and "restraining influence" are oxymorinic terms.
Thanks for your response, I have to admit that I do subscribe to the notion that they are "our bastards" and indeed the argument that this superpower is the first to have the scrutiny of bloggers and netizens the whole world over sharing opinions and knowledge hitherto filtered by national media organisations. I guess it is disappointing to come to the realisation that there is no Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader in the geopolitical world and it is something that I am coming to terms with. However the fact that 60% of Americans believe in the bible literally and are waiting for rapture it seems it is something that those in power don't see as a threat they have a wide basis of malleable proletariat.
Yes, they are "our bastards" and it could be worse; 99.99999999% of the Gulf Arabs believe in God (the two or three who don't have already been buried alive) and they have to take the Koran literally, over 80% of the Chinese believe in spitting and urinating in public places and they also appear to believe in some sort of mythical 5,000 year history with their place firmly rooted at the centre of humanity and the Russians .... well, they are not too bad, not too many of them believe in god, they tend to like drinking and stealing and they can get very violent when really upset. Easy to deal and empathise with if you grew up in Glasgow or Liverpool in the 60s.
Seriously though, better the devil you know and the United States might indeed be the lesser evil, at least, if you are in Kosovo, Kiel or Kilmarnock but not if you are in Khandhar, Karachi or Kerbala. Still, being closer to Kilmarnock and Kiel and, yes, even Kosovo in spirit than I am to the other three places, the eagle with its wings clipped has got to be the lesser evil and it might even be a moderating force. In the shorter term, however, with McCain and Palin at the helm ...... well those fuckers really do have their heads round about where the 99.99999999% of the Gulf Arabs are.
Post a Comment