The Bolivian Vice President
Garcia Linare lends expression to the Bolivian road to socialism,
"communitarian socialism" that is, and his contention
that Bolivia differs from Europe and the United States because
community structures that have resisted capitalist subjugation have
survived is echoed by David Choquehuanca the Foreign Minister who says
in an interview
that by incorporating traditional values Bolivia will find its way to
"communitarian socialism". Nevertheless, while the new Political
Constitution of the State along with a rejection of the
neo-liberal dictates
of the World Bank and the IMF have to be welcomed, there remains an
almost "utopian
socialist" naivety in Bolivia's "Movement
Towards Socialism."
As Jim
Petras, a Marxist scholar who has written extensively on Latin
American politics for half a century, argues, Evo Morales's government
still gives a very high priority to orthodox capitalist growth and that
he does so to the detriment of an alternative. There is, indeed, much to
suggest that the government (MAD-ISP) in La
Paz is adopting policies aimed at appeasing the ruling,
"white", elite rather than overthrowing them and Mr Petras would appear
to hit the nail on the head when he says, that there is an “increased size and scope of foreign owned
multinational corporate extractive capital investments." Just one of
the repercussions of this is voiced by the community teacher, William Ávalos,
from the Bolivia's southern Tarija department, who contends that,
Morales wanted Caraparí the gas capital of Tarija, to be a model city
but if you go there you won't find a model city but "just a cloud of
dust. And they keep extracting gas." However, it might be added that
these ecological problems are just one consequence of a socialist
transition at the expense of socialist revolution. After all,
this is a process which Garcia Linare admits, won't be easy,
saying "it could take decades, even centuries." Of course, there are
those who might contend that the Vice President, as someone who backs
the development of an "Andean-Amazonian
capitalism" is not too upset by the fact that the "socialist transistion"
in "communitarian socialism" might take centuries. My mind almost drifts
to tthe British Labour Party's annual conference and the delegates
singing the "Red Flag".
It is that last point which brings me onto my contention that much of what is being done in Bolivia is like old wine in new bottles and one is reminded of the collapse of the Second International and the advent of a reform socialism, which like the Bolivian "revolution" was to have its successes but was to ultimately fail the planet. Therefore, while it would be wrong not to welcome the developments that we are seeing in Bolivia, we would do well to see them for what they are and when we do that, we will come quickly to the conclusion that progress towards a real socialist society cannot take "decades" or "even centuries", for there can be no compromise with a capitalism which prefers a "cloud of dust" to a model city and there most certainly cannot be any agreement with "foreign owned multinational corporate extractive capital investments." Therefore, it might be concluded that it is a sad indictment on mankind that in the year 2010 stalinism, reform socialism and communitarian socialism are the only "practical" models that most people look to as an alternative to capitalist exploitation. However while this should not lead us to reject any realignment of the real democratic forces in society, it should also not prevent us from looking for another real socialist alternative which, indeed, might be found not in a "third way" but rather in the "fourth way", namely, in revisiting the Fourth International.
No comments:
Post a Comment